Cosgrove v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
| Shawn Cosgrove |
| Wright National Flood Insurance Company |
| 4:2018cv10117 |
| July 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Key West Office |
| Monroe (Office: Key West) |
| K Michael Moore |
| Andrea M Simonton |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 0635 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wright National Flood Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Brown & Brown, Inc., Other Affiliate The Wright Insurance Group, LLC for Wright National Flood Insurance Company (Chibani, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Wright National Flood Insurance Company. Attorney Sarah Elizabeth Chibani added to party Wright National Flood Insurance Company(pty:dft). (Chibani, Sarah) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Parties by Shawn Cosgrove identifying Other Affiliate TAMMY COSGROVE, Other Affiliate Bank of America for Shawn Cosgrove (Austin, Hannah) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Shawn Cosgrove identifying Other Affiliate TAMMY COSGROVE for Shawn Cosgrove (Austin, Hannah) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Wright National Flood Insurance Company. (mc) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Attorney information does not match initiating document. The name of the attorney submitting the complaint does not match the signature on the pdf document. The attorney listed on the initiating document has been added. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (mc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore and Ch. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wright National Flood Insurance Company. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10837486, filed by Shawn Cosgrove. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Austin, Hannah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cosgrove v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wright National Flood Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Elizabeth Chibani |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shawn Cosgrove | |
| Represented By: | Howard J. Levine |
| Represented By: | Michael Vincent Laurato |
| Represented By: | Hannah Elizabeth Austin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
