Pinero v. ALABAMA JACK'S, INC.
Emilio Pinero |
ALABAMA JACK'S, INC. |
4:2018cv10177 |
September 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
James Lawrence King |
Andrea M Simonton |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 4/10/2019. Motions due by 4/15/2019. Pretrial Stipulation due by 6/7/2019. Non Jury Trial set for 9/16/2019 09:00 AM in Key West Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King. in Courtroom I, First Floor Calendar Call set for 9/12/2019 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King in Courtroom II, Eleventh Floor. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/14/2019 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King in Courtroom II, Eleventh Floor. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 10/9/2018. See attached document for full details. (jw) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by ALABAMA JACK'S, INC.. (Loffredo, Thomas) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas Holland Loffredo on behalf of ALABAMA JACK'S, INC.. Attorney Thomas Holland Loffredo added to party ALABAMA JACK'S, INC.(pty:dft). (Loffredo, Thomas) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ALABAMA JACK'S, INC.. (cbr) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King and Ch. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cbr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALABAMA JACK'S, INC.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11004421, filed by Emilio Pinero. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Wassenberg, Lauren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pinero v. ALABAMA JACK'S, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Emilio Pinero | |
Represented By: | Lauren Nicole Wassenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ALABAMA JACK'S, INC. | |
Represented By: | Thomas Holland Loffredo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.