MMI 82 LLC v. ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
Plaintiff: MMI 82 LLC
Defendant: ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
Case Number: 4:2018cv10277
Filed: November 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Becerra
Referring Judge: James Lawrence King
2 Judge: Andrea M Simonton
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2019 Filing 4 Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge pursuant to Administrative Order(s) 2019-3 to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton no longer assigned to case. (yar)
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 8/28/2019. Motions due by 9/2/2019. Pretrial Stipulation due by 10/25/2019. Jury Trial set for 1/13/2020 09:00 AM in Key West Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King in Courtroom I, First Floor. Calendar Call set for 1/9/2020 10:00 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King in Courtroom II, Eleventh Floor. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2019 09:30 AM in Miami Division before Senior Judge James Lawrence King in Courtroom II, Eleventh Floor. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 12/28/2018. See attached document for full details. (jw) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
November 29, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King and Ch. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cbr)
November 29, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - MMI82 LLC d/b/a Casa Morada v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11197445, filed by ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Documents, #3 Exhibit 2 - Plaintiff's Estimate, #4 Exhibit 3 - Corporation Information, #5 Exhibit 4 - Policy)(Ramey, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MMI 82 LLC v. ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.
Represented By: Christopher M. Ramey
Represented By: Justin Sblano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MMI 82 LLC
Represented By: Anthony Manuel Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?