Brown v. Ramsay
| Peter Sean Brown |
| Sheriff Richard A. Ramsay |
| 4:2018cv10279 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| K Michael Moore |
| Andrea M Simonton |
| Edwin G Torres |
| Kathleen M Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 32
ORDER. Responses due by 2/8/2019. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 1/2/2019. See attached document for full details. (lbc)
|
| Filing 31 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Richard A. Ramsay. (Jolly, Bruce) |
|
Filing 30
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #29 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. Upon a review of the motion and for good cause shown, Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's complaint by January 2, 2019 and Plaintiff shall, if appropriate, file a response by January 23, 2019. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 12/20/2018. (jws)
|
| Filing 29 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Richard A. Ramsay. (Jolly, Bruce) |
|
Filing 28
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #26 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney(s) Sarah M. Rich. The Clerk shall add pro hac counsel as co-counsel of record for Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 12/14/2018. (EGT)
|
|
Filing 27
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING #26 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Sarah M. Rich. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11240312 filed by Peter Sean Brown. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres for Pretrial Non-Dispositive Matters. Ch. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton no longer assigned as referral judge in this case. Motions referred to Judge Edwin G. Torres. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 12/14/2018. (jws)
|
| Filing 26 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Sarah M. Rich. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11240312 by Peter Sean Brown. Responses due by 12/27/2018 (Bonilla Lopez, Viviana) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Judge Kathleen M. Williams for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 12/12/2018. Chief Judge K. Michael Moore no longer assigned to case Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/12/2018. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bruce Wallace Jolly on behalf of Richard A. Ramsay. Attorney Bruce Wallace Jolly added to party Richard A. Ramsay(pty:dft). (Jolly, Bruce) |
| Filing 23 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Peter Sean Brown. Richard A. Ramsay served on 12/4/2018, answer due 12/26/2018. (Kacou, Amien) |
|
Filing 22
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. #17 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion #17 is GRANTED. Jason Kim may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to [email protected]. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/8/2018. (osk)
|
|
Filing 21
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. #16 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion #16 is GRANTED. Jonathan Soleimani may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to [email protected]. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/8/2018. (osk)
|
|
Filing 20
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. #15 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion #16 is GRANTED. Avi Garbow may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to [email protected]. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/8/2018. (osk)
|
|
Filing 19
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDREA M. SIMONTON. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton's discovery procedures, which can be found on the Southern District of Florida website, www.flsd.uscourts.gov, under the tab for Judge Simonton, in the drop down menu Judge Information. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/8/2018. (osk)
|
|
Filing 18
PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. This order has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this Order. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference no later than twenty (20) days after the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, or within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint, whichever occurs first. However, if all defendants have not been served by the expiration of this deadline, Plaintiff shall move for an enlargement of time to hold the scheduling conference, not to exceed 90 days from the filing of the Complaint. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The parties should note that the time period for filing a joint scheduling report is not tolled by the filing of any other pleading, such as an amended complaint or Rule 12 motion. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) - The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer or may offer if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (a) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (b) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuits Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court.Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/8/2018. (osk)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jason Kim. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11223983 by Peter Sean Brown. Responses due by 12/21/2018 (Attachments: #1 Certification Rule 4(b), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kacou, Amien) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jonathan Soleimani. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11223974 by Peter Sean Brown. Responses due by 12/21/2018 (Attachments: #1 Certification Rule 4(b), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kacou, Amien) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Avi Garbow. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11223920 by Peter Sean Brown. Responses due by 12/21/2018 (Attachments: #1 Certification Rule 4(b), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kacou, Amien) |
|
Filing 14
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. #10 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 27 is GRANTED. Lee Gelernt may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to [email protected]. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/7/2018. (osk)
|
|
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. #9 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 27 is GRANTED. Omar Jadwat may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to [email protected]. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/7/2018. (osk)
|
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. #8 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 27 is GRANTED. Cody Wofsy may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to [email protected]. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/7/2018. (osk)
|
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. #7 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 27 is GRANTED. Spencer Amdur may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to [email protected]. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/7/2018. (osk)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Lee Gelernt. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11219602 by Peter Sean Brown. Responses due by 12/20/2018 (Attachments: #1 Certification Rule 4(b), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kacou, Amien) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Omar Jadwat. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11219560 by Peter Sean Brown. Responses due by 12/20/2018 (Attachments: #1 Certification Rule 4(b), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kacou, Amien) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Cody Wofsy. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11219518 by Peter Sean Brown. Responses due by 12/20/2018 (Attachments: #1 Certification Rule 4(b), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kacou, Amien) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Spencer Amdur. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11219470 by Peter Sean Brown. Responses due by 12/20/2018 (Attachments: #1 Certification Rule 4(b), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kacou, Amien) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Peter Sean Brown (Kacou, Amien) |
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDREA M. SIMONTON. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton's discovery procedures, which can be found on the Southern District of Florida website, www.flsd.uscourts.gov, under the tab for Judge Simonton, in the drop down menu Judge Information. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/3/2018. (osk)
|
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS PRETRIAL ORDER. This order has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this Order. It is further ORDERED that S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1 shall apply to this case and the parties shall hold a scheduling conference no later than twenty (20) days after the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, or within sixty (60) days after the filing of the complaint, whichever occurs first. However, if all defendants have not been served by the expiration of this deadline, Plaintiff shall move for an enlargement of time to hold the scheduling conference, not to exceed 90 days from the filing of the Complaint. Within ten (10) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report. Failure of counsel to file a joint scheduling report within the deadlines set forth above may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs. The parties should note that the time period for filing a joint scheduling report is not tolled by the filing of any other pleading, such as an amended complaint or Rule 12 motion. The scheduling conference may be held via telephone. At the conference, the parties shall comply with the following agenda that the Court adopts from S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1: (1) Documents (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.1 and 2) - The parties shall determine the procedure for exchanging a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents and other evidence that is reasonably available and that a party expects to offer or may offer if the need arises. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). (a) Documents include computations of the nature and extent of any category of damages claimed by the disclosing party unless the computations are privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(C). (b) Documents include insurance agreements which may be at issue with the satisfaction of the judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(D). (2) List of Witnesses - The parties shall exchange the name, address and telephone number of each individual known to have knowledge of the facts supporting the material allegations of the pleading filed by the party. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The parties have a continuing obligation to disclose this information. (3) Discussions and Deadlines (S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.B.2) - The parties shall discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case. Failure to comply with this Order or to exchange the information listed above may result in sanctions and/or the exclusion of documents or witnesses at the time of trial. S.D. Fla. L.R. 16.1.I. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuits Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court.Telephonic appearances are not permitted for any purpose. Upon reaching a settlement in this matter the parties are instructed to notify the Court by telephone and to file a Notice of Settlement within twenty-four (24) hours. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/3/2018. (osk)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Richard A. Ramsay. (lbc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore and Ch. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (lbc) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Richard A. Ramsay. Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11206151, filed by Peter Sean Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Kacou, Amien) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
