Kastigar et al v. Coherent Research Group, LLC
Plaintiff: John Kastigar and Sheri Kastigar
Defendant: Coherent Research Group, LLC
Case Number: 4:2020cv10047
Filed: May 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Jose E Martinez
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2020 Filing 6 Transmittal Letter Sent with 16th Judicial Circuit in for for Monroe County Florida to: Order Remanding Case to State Court. State Court Case Number: 2020-CA-253-K (Attachments: #1 Order) (mee)
May 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 5/13/2020. See attached document for full details. Text Modified on 5/15/2020 (mee).
May 14, 2020 Filing 4 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation to Remand Case to State Court by Coherent Research Group, LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kemp-Gerstel, Andrew)
May 8, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew Mitchell Moss on behalf of John Kastigar, Sheri Kastigar. Attorney Andrew Mitchell Moss added to party John Kastigar(pty:pla), Attorney Andrew Mitchell Moss added to party Sheri Kastigar(pty:pla). (Moss, Andrew)
May 7, 2020 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee)
May 7, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Amended Complaint) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12852906, filed by Coherent Research Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Composite A, #3 Exhibit B)(Kemp-Gerstel, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kastigar et al v. Coherent Research Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coherent Research Group, LLC
Represented By: Andrew Kemp-Gerstel
Represented By: Paola M. Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Kastigar
Represented By: Ronald Ellis Solomon
Represented By: Andrew Mitchell Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheri Kastigar
Represented By: Ronald Ellis Solomon
Represented By: Andrew Mitchell Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?