Lirio v. Shaner Operating Corp
Chalzeah Lirio |
Shaner Operating Corp |
4:2021cv10118 |
December 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
James Lawrence King |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER Denying As Premature re #7 SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f)/16.1 filed by Shaner Operating Corp Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 12/30/2021. See attached document for full details. (jw) |
Filing 7 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Shaner Operating Corp (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Joint Proposed Scheduling Order)(Horovitz, Samuel) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Supporting Memorandum of Law filed by Chalzeah Lirio. Replies due by 12/27/2021. (Regueiro, Rainier) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Shaner Operating Corp re #4 Order, Regarding Estimated Length of Trial (Horovitz, Samuel) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Defendant to File Estimated Length of Trial re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), filed by Shaner Operating Corp Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 12/6/2021. See attached document for full details. (jw) |
Filing 3 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Supporting Memorandum of Law by Shaner Operating Corp. Responses due by 12/17/2021 (Horovitz, Samuel) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James Lawrence King. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15216615, filed by Shaner Operating Corp. No Answer and/or Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court docket)(Horovitz, Samuel) Modified on 12/3/2021 (jao). Modified on 12/3/2021 (jao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lirio v. Shaner Operating Corp | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Chalzeah Lirio | |
Represented By: | Rainier Regueiro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Shaner Operating Corp | |
Represented By: | Samuel Joseph Horovitz |
Represented By: | Lori Schon Patterson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.