King v. Ramsay et al
| David F. King |
| Rick Ramsay, Major Tim Age, Jay Linares and Richard Analla |
| 4:2022cv10062 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Inquiry by David F. King. (Copy of Docket Sheet mailed) (ebz) |
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance mailed a copy of #15 Amended Order to David King at South Florida Reception Center, Inmate Mail/Parcels, 14000 NW 41st Street Doral, FL 33178. (ebz) |
Filing 15
AMENDED ORDER ON SCREENING re #12 Order Dismissing/Closing Case,, Terminate Motions. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Address by David F. King. (Address Updated) (ebz) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance mailed a copy of #12 Order Dismissing/Closing Case,, Terminate Motions, to David F. King. (ebz) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER ON SCREENING. The Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Motions to Appoint Counsel [DE 7] and [DE11] are DENIED as moot. The three Motions for Subpoena of Records [DE 8], [DE9] and [DE 10] are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/30/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David F. King. Responses due by 8/26/2022 (drz) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Subpoena of Records (of all Inmate worker Kitchen Staff..) by David F. King. (ebz) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Subpoena of Records (all official records, written or kiosk, of my movements between dorms..) by David F. King. (ebz) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Subpoena of Records (dates for Covid-19 Quarantine lock downs in "D" "Delta" Trustee Dorm) by David F. King. (ebz) Modified text on 8/12/2022 (ebz). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David F. King. Responses due by 8/26/2022 (ebz) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance mailed a copy of #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to David F. King and the Florida Department of Corrections. (ebz) Modified text on 7/28/2022 (ebz). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS AND ESTABLISHING A DEBT OF $350. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis DE #3 is GRANTED to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. The plaintiff owes the United States a debt of $350.00 which must be paid to the Clerk of the Court as funds become available. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 7/28/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 7/28/2022. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David F. King. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Tim Age, Richard Analla, Jay Linares, Rick Ramsay. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by David F. King.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
