Schwachter v. Kane
| Robert Samuel Schwachter |
| Robert Kane |
| 4:2022cv10103 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER. On or before February 10, 2023, Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint that complies with the Court's Dismissal Order. The failure to do so shall result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 1/9/2023. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner) form) (daa)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance Mailed Copy of Order to Robert Samuel Schwatcher re #5 Order, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings and 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form. (ebz) Modified text on 11/23/2022 (ebz). |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS Administrative Order Closing Case per #5 Order Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice. This Order closes the case for administrative purposes only and shall not affect the substantive rights of the parties. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/22/2022. (ah05)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Plaintiff's Complaint, (ECF No. #1 ), is DISMISSED without prejudice. On or before December 30, 2022, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail to Defendant a copy of the 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form, along with this Order. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/22/2022. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner) form) (daa)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's IFP Motion, (ECF No. #3 ), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. On or before December 30, 2022, Plaintiff shall either pay the $402 filing fee, or renew his motion for leave to proceed IFP. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail Plaintiff a copy of the pro se prisoner IFP form, along with this Order. Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 11/22/2022. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (daa)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Samuel Schwachter. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Jose E. Martinez. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Robert Kane. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Robert Samuel Schwachter.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schwachter v. Kane | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Samuel Schwachter | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert Kane | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
