Woodruff v. Florida Department of Corrections
Michael Clayton Woodruff |
Florida Department of Corrections |
4:2023cv10037 |
May 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Darrin P Gayles |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Florida Department of Corrections. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Index to Appendix, #2 Appendix App. A-AA, #3 Appendix App. AB-AM, #4 Appendix App. AN-AU, #5 Appendix App. AV-BG, #6 Transcripts Transcript Index, #7 Transcripts Transcript A, #8 Transcripts Transcript B, #9 Transcripts Transcript C, #10 Transcripts Transcript D, #11 Transcripts Transcript E, #12 Transcripts Transcript F, #13 Transcripts Transcript G, #14 Transcripts Transcript H)(McNab, Kayla) |
Reset Deadlines: Show Cause Response due by 7/20/2023. Per d.e. 9 Order. (mee) |
Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent shall have until July 20, 2023 to respond to the Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 7/10/2023. (sil) |
Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Florida Department of Corrections. (McNab, Kayla) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kayla Heather McNab on behalf of Florida Department of Corrections. Attorney Kayla Heather McNab added to party Florida Department of Corrections(pty:dft). (McNab, Kayla) |
Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: 28 U.S.C. 2254. Show Cause Response due by 6/2/2023. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 5/26/2023. See attached document for full details. (mee) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Michael Clayton Woodruff Civil Cover Sheet (McLain, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (nwn) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM of Law re #1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Michael Clayton Woodruff. (nwn) |
Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles (nwn) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 . Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16648817, filed by Michael Clayton Woodruff. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(McLain, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Woodruff v. Florida Department of Corrections | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Clayton Woodruff | |
Represented By: | Matthew Raul McLain |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections | |
Represented By: | Noticing 2254 SAG Miami-Dade/Monroe |
Represented By: | Kayla Heather McNab |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.