Licknack v. Keys Fresh Seafood LLC et al
| Thomas Michael Licknack |
| Keys Fresh Seafood LLC, Keys Fresh Seafood Market LLC, Keys Fresh Crabs LLC, Ryan Shapiro, John Buckheim, Charles P. Mendola and Brandon Geide |
| 4:2024cv10026 |
| March 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER dismissing, with prejudice, this action in its entirety against Defendants Keys Fresh Seafood LLC, Keys Fresh Seafood Market LLC, Keys Fresh Crabs LLC, Ryan Shapiro, John Buckheim, Charles Mendola, and Brandon Geide pursuant to the Parties' #11 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 5/15/2024. (bs00)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint) by Thomas Michael Licknack (Kozolchyk, Elliot) |
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting the Parties' #9 Joint Motion to Approve Settlement. Based thereon, the [9-1] Settlement Agreement is approved. The Parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal within ten (10) days of this Order. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 5/9/2024. (bs00)
|
| Filing 9 Joint MOTION for Settlement Approval by Thomas Michael Licknack. Responses due by 5/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Settlement Agreement)(Kozolchyk, Elliot) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER administratively closing this case in light of the parties' #7 Notice of Settlement. The parties are hereby notified that, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, they must file a Stipulation or Notice of Dismissal and/or Settlement Agreement along with any other pertinent document necessary to conclude this action. Any pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 4/15/2024. (bs00)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Thomas Michael Licknack (Kozolchyk, Elliot) |
| Filing 6 Statement of: Claim by Thomas Michael Licknack re 5 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,,,,,,, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff Thomas Michael Licknack's Statement of Claim)(Kozolchyk, Elliot) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. The Complaint in this action is filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. ("FLSA"). In order to assist the Court in the management of this case, and in an effort to foster early and cost-effective resolution, the parties are ORDERED to comply with the following procedures: Under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff is required to state a "short and plain statement of the claim." While this Rule places only a light burden on a plaintiff, the Court requires complaints filed under the FLSA to include, at a minimum, a statement setting forth the following with respect to each Plaintiff: (a) An initial estimate of the total amount of alleged unpaid wages; (b) A preliminary calculation of such wages; (c) The approximate period during which the alleged FLSA violations occurred; and (d) The nature of the wages (e.g., overtime or straight time). Plaintiff is directed to file a "Statement of Claim" by April 3, 2024. Plaintiff(s) shall promptly serve a copy of this Order, the Statement of Claim, and copies of all supporting documents (including time sheets, pay stubs, etc.) upon counsel for Defendant(s) once an appearance has been made or at the time the Statement of Claim is filed (if defense counsel has already appeared). Defendant(s) shall then file a "Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Claim" setting forth in detail any defenses to Plaintiff's claim(s) and serve copies of all supporting documents within twenty (20) days of being served with Plaintiff's Statement of Claim. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 3/20/2024. (bs00)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 3/20/2024. (bs00) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to John Buckheim, Brandon Geide, Keys Fresh Crabs LLC, Keys Fresh Seafood LLC, Keys Fresh Seafood Market LLC, Charles P. Mendola, Ryan Shapiro. (nwn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number BFLSDC-17381083, filed by Thomas Michael Licknac. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Statement of Claim)(Kozolchyk, Elliot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
