Bosi v. Nutribullet, LLC et al
| Megan Bosi |
| Nutribullet, LLC and Capital Brands, LLC |
| 4:2024cv10044 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING a corporate disclosure statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1(a)(2). The Court is unable to discern whether it has subject matter jurisdiction over this action based on Defendants' Notice of Removal. [ECF No. 1]. In their Notice of Removal, Defendants Nutribullet, LLC and Capital Brands, LLC argue that the Court has original diversity jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332. Id. Defendants assert that they are citizens of California, making Defendants and Plaintiff citizens of different states. Id. paras. 5, 8-12. Notably, however, both Defendants fail to identify their members and respective citizenship. As the Eleventh Circuit has explained, "a limited liability company is a citizen of any state of which a member of the company is a citizen" and, thus, "[t]o sufficiently allege the citizenship of [an LLC], a party must list the citizenships of all members of the limited liability company." Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings L.L.C., 374 F.3d 1020, 1022 (11th Cir. 2004) (emphasis added). Thus, Defendants shall file their corporate disclosure statements on or before May 17, 2024. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 5/10/2024. (bs00)
|
| Filing 6 Defendant's Notice of Filing Exhibits to Notice of Removal by Capital Brands, LLC, Nutribullet, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - State Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Return of Service) (Huber, Merle) |
| Filing 5 First NOTICE of Filing Supplemental Documents by Capital Brands, LLC, Nutribullet, LLC (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement State Court Docket Filings) (Huber, Merle) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. State Court Records not included. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the State Court Records attached within 24 hours. (caw) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (caw) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (caw) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Megan Bosi v. Nutribullet LLC, and Capital Brands, LLC) Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17518060, filed by Capital Brands, LLC, Nutribullet, LLC.(Huber, Merle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
