Ferrell v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
| Ricky Ferrell |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. |
| 4:2026cv10046 |
| May 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Darrin P Gayles |
| Detra Shaw-Wilder |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER SETTING CIVIL TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL SCHEDULE, REQUIRING MEDIATION, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MOTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE : Jury Trial set for 2/21/2028 in Miami Division before Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Telephonic Calendar Call set for 2/16/2028 09:30 AM before Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Telephonic Status Conference set for 10/20/2027 10:00 AM before Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Mediation Deadline 9/30/2027. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Detra Shaw-Wilder for Discovery Matters. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles on 7/20/2026. See attached document for full details. (wce) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter Michael Hoogerwoerd on behalf of Ricky Ferrell. Attorney Peter Michael Hoogerwoerd added to party Ricky Ferrell(pty:pla). (Hoogerwoerd, Peter) |
| Filing 13 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by United Parcel Service, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order Setting Civil Trial Date and Pretrial Schedule)(Phillips, John) |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 16.1, on or before July 8, 2026, the parties shall prepare and file a Joint Scheduling Report, as well as Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements.The parties shall also file a Proposed Scheduling Order, adhering to the format and guidance of the attached form. If the parties deviate in any way from that format and guidance, they shall contemporaneously submit a written explanation, which provides their purported justification for each and every deviation. If the parties fail to submit such written explanation, the Court may enter a Scheduling Order that does not take into account the parties' proposed dates.Failure to comply with this Order shall be grounds for dismissal without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (mp02)
|
| Filing 11 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Parcel Service, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent United Parcel Service, Inc., Corporate Parent Anthony M. Georges-Pierre, Other Affiliate Mark S. Edwards, Other Affiliate Phelps Dunbar LLP, Other Affiliate John Phillips, Other Affiliate United Parcel Service, Inc., Other Affiliate Peter M. Hoogerwoerd, Other Affiliate Remer, Georges-Pierre & Hoogerwoerd, PLLC, Other Affiliate Anthony M. Georges-Pierre, Other Affiliate Ricky Ferrell, Other Affiliate Wesley Thorp for United Parcel Service, Inc. (Phillips, John) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Phillips, John) |
| Filing 9 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (wce) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Parcel Service, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent United Parcel Service, Inc. for United Parcel Service, Inc. (Phillips, John) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Defendant's #6 Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to the Complaint. On or before June 22, 2026, Defendant shall file its response. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (mp02)
|
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by United Parcel Service, Inc.. Responses due by 6/16/2026. (Phillips, John) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. This action has been removed from state court. Within seven (7) days of this Order, each party shall separately file a copy of any pending motions that it filed in the state court proceedings. Thereafter, the opposing party shall file its response to the pending motion within five (5) days. If the non-removing party seeks remand (on a basis other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction-which can be raised at any time), it shall file a motion to remand within thirty (30) days of removal. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may be grounds for remand, dismissal, or sanctions. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (mp02)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every filing shall be double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point typeface. Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, the parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions. Failure to comply with ANY of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions including, but not limited to, the striking of the filing or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Darrin P. Gayles (mp02) |
| Filing 3 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Wesley Thorp, mailing date May 27, 2026, (pt) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Darrin P. Gayles. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Detra Shaw-Wilder is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Ricky Ferrell vs. United Parcel Service, Inc.) Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19584112, filed by United Parcel Service, Inc. (No Answer/Motion to Dismiss Filed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Phillips, John) Modified Text on 5/27/2026 (wce). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ferrell v. United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ricky Ferrell | |
| Represented By: | Peter Michael Hoogerwoerd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John Edmund Phillips, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
