Powell v. Boldstar Technical,LLC et al
Boldstar Technical,LLC and Michael S. Powell |
Home Depot,Inc. and Industriaplex,Inc |
9:2007cv80435 |
May 17, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
West Palm Beach Office |
Palm Beach |
Daniel T. K. Hurley |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 817 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 805 ; granting in part 708 Motion to Tax Costs; and denying 807 Motion to defer ruling. Signed by Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley on 10/18/10. (lr) |
Filing 768 OMNIBUS ORDER & MEMORANDUM OPINION CONTAINING FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW & ruling as follows: denying 699 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; granting 700 Motion for Prejudgment Interest; granting in part 701 Motion for Enhanced Damages; granting 707 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 716 Motion for Relief from Judgment; denying 718 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 719 Motion for New Trial; denying 763 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley on 5/28/2010. (lr) |
Filing 574 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 561 & denying 303 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley on 11/17/09. (lr) |
Filing 467 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 158 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 159 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley on 5/30/2009. (lr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.