Magaldi v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
| Victoria Magaldi |
| Safeco Insurance Company of America |
| Safeco Insurance Company of America |
| Victoria Magaldi |
| 9:2007cv80618 |
| July 12, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| West Palm Beach Office |
| Palm Beach |
| James M. Hopkins |
| Donald M. Middlebrooks |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 80 84 Defendant Safeco's Motion to Tax Costs; adopting Report and Recommendation 86 of Magistrate Judge James Hopkins and entering Final Judgment on Costs in total sum of $902.75. Signed by Judge Daniel T. K. Hurley on 6/29/09. (tda)
|
|
Filing
86
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as to Defendants Motion for Award of Costs and Entry of Judgment 80 ,[ 84]. The Court RECOMMENDS that the District Court DENY Defendants Motion for Entry of Judgment on all of the costs it seeks 84 , and GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART Defendants Motion for an Award of Costs 80 ,[ 84]. A party shall serve and file written objections, if any, to this Report and Recommendation with the Honorable Daniel T. K. Hurley, United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of Florida, within ten (10) days of being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge James M. Hopkins on 5/21/2009. (tmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
