Trace-Wilco, Inc. v. Symantec Corporation
Plaintiff: Trace-Wilco, Inc.
Defendant: Symantec Corporation
Case Number: 9:2008cv80877
Filed: August 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Patent Office
County: Palm Beach
Presiding Judge: Kenneth A. Marra
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 35:0271 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER AND OPINION granting 18 Motion to Transfer Venue. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court, Northern District of California. This case is closed. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 2/23/2009. (ir)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trace-Wilco, Inc. v. Symantec Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trace-Wilco, Inc.
Represented By: Raymond Pardo Niro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Symantec Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?