Wackenhut Services, Inc. v. Artman Studios,Inc.
Wackenhut Services, Inc. |
Artman Studios,Inc. |
9:2008cv80956 |
August 28, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Copyright Office |
Palm Beach |
Kenneth A. Marra |
Defendant |
Federal Question |
17:0101 Copyright Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Dismiss; denying 44 Motion to Dismiss Count VII of Second Amended Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 9/16/2009. (ir) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wackenhut Services, Inc. v. Artman Studios,Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wackenhut Services, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Steven Ira Peretz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Artman Studios,Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.