Engineered Tax Services, Inc. v. Scarpello Consulting, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Florida Southern District Engineered Tax Services, Inc. v. Scarpello Consulting, Inc.

Engineered Tax Services, Inc. v. Scarpello Consulting, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Engineered Tax Services, Inc.
Defendant:	Scarpello Consulting, Inc.
Case Number:	9:2016cv81795
Filed:	October 26, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office:	West Palm Beach Office
County:	Palm Beach (Office: West Palm Beach)
Presiding Judge:	Kenneth A. Marra
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 44
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 6, 2018	Filing 156 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT SCARPELLO CONSULTING, INC.'S MOTION FOR A BILL OF COSTS [DE 136] AND ON PLAINTIFF ENGINEERED TAX SERVICES, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING DISPOSITION OF APPEAL OR IN THE ALTER NATIVE, FOR APPROVAL OF POSTING OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND TO STAY EXECUTION OF THE BILL OF COSTS [DE 140]: Recommending that the District Court GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Pending Disposition of Appeal, or in the altemative, for Approval of Supersedeas Bond [DE 140]. The Court RECOMMENDS that the District Court GRANT Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of Supersedeas Bond to stay execution of the Bill of Costs [DE 136] pending appeal and ORDER Plaintiff to deliver to th e Clerk of Court a supersedeas bond in the form of a cashier's check (or other means acceptable to the Clerk) payable to the Clerk of Court in the amount of $3,358.30, where it will accrue interest while deposited. The Court RECOMMENDS that the District Court deny Plaintiff's motion [DE 140] in a1l other respects. The Court also RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion for Bill of Costs [DE 136] be denied without prejudice to re-file after the appeal is concluded, upon the posting of the supersedeas appeal bond in the amount specified above in a prompt and timely manner. Objections to R&R due by 11/20/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 11/6/2018. See attached document for full details. (kza)
February 6, 2018	Filing 91 ORDER denying 69 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Production of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 2/6/2018. (kza)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 6, 2018

Filing 156 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT SCARPELLO CONSULTING, INC.'S MOTION FOR A BILL OF COSTS [DE 136] AND ON PLAINTIFF ENGINEERED TAX SERVICES, INC.'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING DISPOSITION OF APPEAL OR IN THE ALTER NATIVE, FOR APPROVAL OF POSTING OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND TO STAY EXECUTION OF THE BILL OF COSTS [DE 140]: Recommending that the District Court GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Pending Disposition of Appeal, or in the altemative, for Approval of Supersedeas Bond [DE 140]. The Court RECOMMENDS that the District Court GRANT Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of Supersedeas Bond to stay execution of the Bill of Costs [DE 136] pending appeal and ORDER Plaintiff to deliver to th e Clerk of Court a supersedeas bond in the form of a cashier's check (or other means acceptable to the Clerk) payable to the Clerk of Court in the amount of $3,358.30, where it will accrue interest while deposited. The Court RECOMMENDS that the District Court deny Plaintiff's motion [DE 140] in a1l other respects. The Court also RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion for Bill of Costs [DE 136] be denied without prejudice to re-file after the appeal is concluded, upon the posting of the supersedeas appeal bond in the amount specified above in a prompt and timely manner. Objections to R&R due by 11/20/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 11/6/2018. See attached document for full details. (kza)

February 6, 2018

Filing 91 ORDER denying 69 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Production of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 2/6/2018. (kza)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Engineered Tax Services, Inc. v. Scarpello Consulting, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Engineered Tax Services, Inc.
Represented By:	Dawn Marie Alba
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Scarpello Consulting, Inc.
Represented By:	Lorin Louis Mrachek
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?