Forbes et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
| Kathleen Forbes, Lisa O'Brien, Lou Ann Hawes, Linda Ray, Judith Danneman, Bridgette Bramley and Edna Remington |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 9:2017cv81225 |
| November 6, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| West Palm Beach Office |
| Palm Beach (Office: West Palm Beach) |
| James M. Hopkins |
| Robin L. Rosenberg |
| Labor: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
ORDER denying 158 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 9/19/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
Filing
156
ORDER granting 90 Motion for Summary Judgment;denying as moot 82 Motion ; denying as moot 134 Motion to Strike ; denying as moot 142 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 143 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 144 Motion for Leave to File ; denying as moot 155 Motion to Strike. Any pending motions are denied as moot, Closing Case. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 8/16/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Dismiss. The partiesresponses, not to exceed five pages, to the Courts order to show cause are dueby March 18, 2019. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 3/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.