Aguilar v. United States of America
| Carlos Aguilar |
| United States of America |
| 9:2018cv80947 |
| July 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| West Palm Beach Office |
| Palm Beach (Office: West Palm Beach) |
| Beth Bloom |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Clerks Notice to Filer re #5 Summons Returned Executed, #6 Notice of Action/Publication. Wrong Event Selected; ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong event. The document was re-docketed by the Clerk, see 7 8 . It is not necessary to refile this document. (cbr) |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE as to Attorney General. see DE #6 for image (cbr) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on 1 Complaint, United States of America served on 7/31/2018, answer due 10/1/2018. see DE #5 for image (cbr) Text Modified on 8/16/2018 (cbr). |
| Filing 6 Notice of Action/Publication filed by Carlos Aguilar. United States of America answer/written defenses due by 10/1/2018. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Summons - Attorney General)(Fronrath, Dennis) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Carlos Aguilar. United States of America served on 7/31/2018, answer due 8/21/2018. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Summons - US Attorney)(Fronrath, Dennis) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States of America (U.S. Attorney), and U.S. Attorney General (mc) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Documents Improperly Arranged. The Filer did not properly attach the Exhibits. Future filings must comply with the CM/ECF Civil Case Opening Guide. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (mc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (mc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10828122, filed by Carlos Aguilar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - US Attorney, #3 Summons - Attorney General, #4 Exhibits)(Fronrath, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aguilar v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlos Aguilar | |
| Represented By: | Dennis Todd Fronrath |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
