Cohan v. DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC.
| Howard Cohan |
| DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC. |
| 9:2018cv81027 |
| August 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| West Palm Beach Office |
| Palm Beach (Office: West Palm Beach) |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint by DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC.. Attorney Justin Canner Sorel added to party DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC.(pty:dft). (Sorel, Justin) |
| Filing 9 Amended RESPONSE to #5 Order of Requirements, by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pacer Search, #2 Exhibit Prior Pleadings)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC., filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Howard Cohan. DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC. served on 8/9/2018, answer due 8/30/2018. (Sconzo, Gregory) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #5 Order of Requirements, by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Pacer Search)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING ANY PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT Verified Statement due by 8/10/2018. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/3/2018. See attached document for full details. (yha)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/3/2018. See attached document for full details. (yha)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC.. (lh) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10874803, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit Receipt)(Sconzo, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cohan v. DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Steven Sconzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DSS RESTAURANT MGMT INC. | |
| Represented By: | Justin Canner Sorel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
