Factory Mutual Insurance Company v. Hoar Construction, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Hoar Construction, LLC and Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2018cv81237
Filed: September 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Dave Lee Brannon
Referring Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2018 Filing 14 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc.. (Chiocca, John)
October 29, 2018 Filing 13 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc. by Hoar Construction, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Subcontract)(Matthews, William)
October 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER VACATING CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT and granting #11 Motion to Vacate Clerk's Entry of Default. Defendant must respond to the Complaint on or before November 7, 2018. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 10/23/2018. See attached document for full details. (ar2)
October 23, 2018 Reset Answer Due Deadline per DE #12 Order: Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc. Answer due 11/7/2018. (ar2)
October 22, 2018 Filing 11 Defendant's MOTION to Set Aside Default by Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc.. Attorney John Anthony Chiocca added to party Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Agreed Order on Defendant Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Vacate Default)(Chiocca, John)
October 17, 2018 Filing 10 (VACATED by DE #12 Order) Clerks Entry of Default as to Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc. - Motions Terminated: #9 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 10/17/2018. (mc) Modified text on 10/23/2018 (ar2).
October 16, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default as to Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc. by Factory Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Leichtling, Adam)
October 16, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Factory Mutual Insurance Company. Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc. served on 9/20/2018, answer due 10/11/2018. (Leichtling, Adam)
October 8, 2018 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Parties/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Factory Mutual Insurance Company (Leichtling, Adam)
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The deadline for Defendant Hoar Construction, LLC to respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint (DE #1 ) is extended to October 29, 2018. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 10/5/2018. (kal)
October 4, 2018 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hoar Construction, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Hoar Holdings, LLC for Hoar Construction, LLC (Matthews, William)
October 4, 2018 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Hoar Construction, LLC. Attorney William Carlton Matthews added to party Hoar Construction, LLC(pty:dft). (Matthews, William)
September 14, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (cbr)
September 14, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cbr)
September 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-10995806, filed by Factory Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Leichtling, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Factory Mutual Insurance Company v. Hoar Construction, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Adam Brian Leichtling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hoar Construction, LLC
Represented By: William Carlton Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certified Roofing Specialists, Inc.
Represented By: John Anthony Chiocca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?