Caplan v. APOLLO INVESTMENTS, INC.
Howard Michael Caplan |
APOLLO INVESTMENTS, INC. |
9:2018cv81377 |
October 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Bruce E Reinhart |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: APOLLO INVESTMENTS, INC. response due 12/21/2018. per DE 12 (cbr) |
Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading or a responsive motion by December 21, 2018. Defendant's Motion is denied to the extent that Defendant seeks a more lengthy extension. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 12/6/2018. (sk01) |
Filing 11 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by APOLLO INVESTMENTS, INC.. Attorney Adam Jason Steinberg added to party APOLLO INVESTMENTS, INC.(pty:dft). (Steinberg, Adam) |
Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Select a Mediator and Schedule Mediation. The parties shall select a mediator and schedule mediation within seven days of Defendant's appearance in this matter. The Motion for Extension of Time is denied to the extent that Plaintiff seeks a more lengthy extension. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 11/29/2018. (sk01) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Select Mediator and Schedule Mediation re #4 Scheduling Order,,,, Order of Requirements,,,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,,,, Order Referring Case to Mediation,,, by Howard Michael Caplan. Responses due by 12/13/2018 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stern, Ronald) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Howard Michael Caplan. APOLLO INVESTMENTS, INC. served on 11/15/2018, answer due 12/6/2018. (Stern, Ronald) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #5 Order,, Order Referring Case to Mediation, by Ronald E. Stern on behalf of Howard Michael Caplan (Stern, Ronald) |
Filing 6 STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE BRUCE REINHART. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart on 10/26/2018. See attached document for full details. (ar2) |
Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING ANY PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND ORDER REQUIRING MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 10/26/2018. See attached document for full details. (ar2) |
Filing 4 ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE, CALENDAR CALL, PRETRIAL DEADLINES, AND TRIAL DATE: (Fact Discovery due by 4/19/2019., Expert Discovery due by 5/6/2019., Jury Trial set for 8/19/2019 09:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg., Calendar Call set for 8/14/2019 09:00 AM before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg., Status Conference set for 6/19/2019 09:30 AM before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg.), ORDER OF REQUIREMENTS in ADA case, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart for Discovery Matters, and ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 10/26/2018. See attached document for full details. (ar2) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. Modified text on 10/26/2018 (ar2). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to APOLLO INVESTMENTS, INC. (bb) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (bb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11071978, filed by Howard Michael Caplan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Stern, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Caplan v. APOLLO INVESTMENTS, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: APOLLO INVESTMENTS, INC. | |
Represented By: | Adam Jason Steinberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan | |
Represented By: | Ronald E. Stern |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.