Timothy Francis McTigue Trust et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
| Timothy McTigue Construction, Inc. and Timothy Francis McTigue Trust |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank |
| 9:2018cv81395 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING CASE. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 11/1/2018. See attached document for full details. (pes)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Timothy Francis McTigue Trust, Timothy McTigue Construction, Inc.. (vmz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (vmz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JP Morgan Chase Bank. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Timothy Francis McTigue Trust, Timothy McTigue Construction, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(vmz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
