Loren v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sheila Loren
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security and United States of America c/o US Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan
Case Number: 9:2018cv81587
Filed: November 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: James I Cohn
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Sheila Loren. United States of America c/o US Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan served on 1/4/2019, answer due 3/5/2019. (Loren, Bruce)
January 2, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA C/O US Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan. (cds)
December 21, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney General (cbr)
December 20, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Sheila Loren (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) US Attorney General Summons, #2 Summon(s) US Attorney for Miami Summons) (Loren, Bruce)
December 4, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline by Sheila Loren. Commissioner of Social Security served on 11/19/2018, answer due 12/10/2018. (Loren, Bruce)
November 16, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security.(jao)
November 16, 2018 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James I. Cohn. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
November 16, 2018 Filing 1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus against Nancy A Berryhill. Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11165822, filed by Sheila Loren. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Loren, Bruce)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loren v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Noticing Social Security US Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America c/o US Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Loren
Represented By: Bruce E. Loren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?