DeFeo v. CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC
Plaintiff: Anna Marie DeFeo
Defendant: CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC
Case Number: 9:2019cv80304
Filed: March 5, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Referring Judge: Bruce E Reinhart
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 4/4/2019. See attached document for full details. (ra)
April 4, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Anna Marie DeFeo (Leal, Alberto)
April 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER on Default Procedures re #1 Complaint filed by Anna Marie DeFeo, as to #1 Complaint. ( Replies due by 4/8/2019.) Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 4/1/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz)
April 1, 2019 Set/Reset Answer Due Deadline: CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC response due 4/8/2019 per order de #7 . (drz)
March 13, 2019 Filing 6 First RESPONSE To order requiring certificate of counsel regarding any prior filings made under the ADA by Anna Marie DeFeo. (Leal, Alberto)
March 12, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Anna Marie DeFeo. CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC served on 3/8/2019, answer due 3/29/2019. (Leal, Alberto)
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Requiring Verified Certificate of Counsel, Scheduling Report, and Certificates of Interested Parties. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/6/2019. See attached document for full details. (drz)
March 6, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC. (drz)
March 5, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz)
March 5, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11447847, filed by Anna Marie DeFeo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Leal, Alberto)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeFeo v. CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna Marie DeFeo
Represented By: Alberto R. Leal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARLISLE ETCETERA LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?