Emanuel v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Earl Emanuel
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General
Case Number: 9:2019cv80434
Filed: March 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William P Dimitrouleas
Referring Judge: Lisette M Reid
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The Petitioner has filed a motion seeking an additional sixty days to file his reply to the State's response. As was noted in the Order to Show Cause, the Petitioner is not required to file a reply and any reply was to be filed within thirty days of the State's response and not exceed ten pages. The Petitioner's request for a sixty day extension is denied. The Petitioner is granted an extension of fourteen days and shall file his reply on or before July 23, 2019.The Petitioner is reminded that the reply shall not exceed ten pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 7/9/2019. (jb01)
July 9, 2019 Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to #10 Response to Order to Show Cause by Earl Emanuel. (drz)
June 7, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE by Florida Department of Corrections Notice of Filing Transcripts (Attachments: #1 Transcripts Trial Transcript, #2 Transcripts Evidentiary Hearing Transcript) (Hernandez, Marc)
June 7, 2019 Filing 11 APPENDIX by Florida Department of Corrections (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Hernandez, Marc)
June 7, 2019 Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Florida Department of Corrections. (Hernandez, Marc)
May 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File. THIS MATTER having been brought on motion of Respondent and after reviewing sameand for good cause shown it is thereupon:ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Respondents motion for an extension of time inwhich to file the States Response and Appendix to this Courts Order be and is herebyGRANTED/DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before June 8, 2019, Respondent shallserve its Response and Appendix in accordance with this Courts original order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 5/8/2019. (jb01)
May 8, 2019 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Florida Department of Corrections. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hernandez, Marc)
April 3, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc Brandon Hernandez on behalf of Florida Department of Corrections. Attorney Marc Brandon Hernandez added to party Florida Department of Corrections(pty:dft). (Hernandez, Marc)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 28 U.S.C. 2254 on or before forty-five days from the date of this order the respondent shall file a memorandum of fact and law to show cause why this petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 3/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRO SE LITIGANT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 3/28/2019. See attached document for full details. (fbn)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Granting to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid on 3/28/2019. (jb01)
March 26, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Earl Emanuel. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Account Statement)(ebz)
March 26, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas and Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-2, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. (ebz)
March 26, 2019 Filing 1 Application/Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filing fee $5.00. IFP Filed, filed by Earl Emanuel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(ebz) Modified filing fee on 3/27/2019 (ebz).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emanuel v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Represented By: Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North
Represented By: Marc Brandon Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Attorney General
Represented By: Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Earl Emanuel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?