Cohan v. Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan
Defendant: Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2019cv80462
Filed: April 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Bruce E Reinhart
Referring Judge: Robin L Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2019 Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Howard Cohan (Feinstein, Mark)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER STAYING CASE AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. All pending deadlines are TERMINATED. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 5/15/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
May 15, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Howard Cohan (Feinstein, Mark)
May 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer. Answer due 5/20/2019. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 5/6/2019. (kbs)
May 6, 2019 Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.. (Diaz Cofino, Michelle)
April 29, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michelle Diaz Cofino on behalf of Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.. Attorney Michelle Diaz Cofino added to party Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.(pty:dft). (Diaz Cofino, Michelle)
April 29, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Reginald John Clyne on behalf of Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.. Attorney Reginald John Clyne added to party Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.(pty:dft). (Clyne, Reginald)
April 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE BRUCE REINHART Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart on 4/23/2019. See attached document for full details. (ail)
April 23, 2019 Filing 7 Statement of: VERIFIED STATEMENT OF COUNSEL REGARDING ANY PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT by Howard Cohan re #6 Order (Feinstein, Mark)
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING ANY PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 4/22/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE, CALENDAR CALL, PRETRIAL DEADLINES, ANDTRIAL DATE, ORDER OF REQUIREMENTS, ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MEDIATION: (Fact Discovery due by 8/9/2019., Expert Discovery due by 8/21/2019., Dispositive Motions due by 9/9/2019., Jury Trial set for 12/9/2019 09:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg., Calendar Call set for 12/4/2019 09:00 AM before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg., Status Conference set for 10/23/2019 09:30 AM before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg.) Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 4/22/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
April 16, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Arrigo Enterprises, Inc. served on 4/12/2019, answer due 5/3/2019. (Feinstein, Mark)
April 3, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.. (kpe)
April 3, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe)
April 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11528861, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Feinstein, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cohan v. Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan
Represented By: Mark David Feinstein
Represented By: Alexandria Rae Feinstein
Represented By: Neil Steven Odessky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arrigo Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Michelle Diaz Cofino
Represented By: Reginald John Clyne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?