KANG v. Office Depot Inc.
| JACK KANG |
| Office Depot Inc. |
| 9:2019cv80582 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kenneth A Marra |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Office Depot Inc.. (Wilson, Courtney) |
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS UNOPPOSED #7 MOTION TOEXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [DE 7]. Answer due 6/18/2019. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 6/4/2019. See attached document for full details. (kpe)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Office Depot Inc.. Attorney Courtney Blair Wilson added to party Office Depot Inc.(pty:dft). (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilson, Courtney) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by JACK KANG. Office Depot Inc. served on 5/7/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Harrell, Yvette) |
|
Filing 5
Order Requiring Counsel to Confer and File Joint Scheduling Report. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/1/2019. See attached document for full details. (ir)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Office Depot Inc.. (kpe) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Venue on the Civil Cover Sheet does not match the initiating document. The Clerks Office confirmed Palm Beach (Office - West Palm Beach) as the county with the filer. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kenneth A. Marra. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Office Depot Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11602674, filed by JACK KANG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Harrell, Yvette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KANG v. Office Depot Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Office Depot Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Courtney Blair Wilson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JACK KANG | |
| Represented By: | Yvette J Harrell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
