Racine v. SunTrust Bank
Caroline D Racine |
SunTrust Bank |
9:2019cv80637 |
May 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Dave Lee Brannon |
Donald M Middlebrooks |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Caroline D Racine (Jenkins, Chase) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint and to Strike Jury Demand filed by Caroline D Racine. Replies due by 7/15/2019. (Jenkins, Chase) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint and to Strike Jury Demand by SunTrust Bank. Responses due by 7/8/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Steiner, Mark) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Added Charles A Mancuso. (Jenkins, Chase) |
Filing 10 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction Filed in Error (jao). Docket text modified on 6/5/2019 (jc). |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark Elliot Steiner on behalf of SunTrust Bank. Attorney Mark Elliot Steiner added to party SunTrust Bank(pty:dft). (Steiner, Mark) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to SunTrust Bank. (cbr) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Caroline D Racine (Jenkins, Chase) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Caroline D Racine Civil Cover Sheet (Lorenzo, Jorge) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SunTrust Bank. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11640003, filed by Caroline D Racine. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Lorenzo, Jorge) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Racine v. SunTrust Bank | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SunTrust Bank | |
Represented By: | Mark Elliot Steiner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Caroline D Racine | |
Represented By: | Jorge Damian Lorenzo |
Represented By: | Chase Everett Jenkins |
Represented By: | Laura Louise Hoy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.