Heasley v. National Oak Distributors, Inc.
| Timothy J Heasley |
| National Oak Distributors, Inc. |
| 9:2019cv80649 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STATUS REPORT in response to Order to Show Cause by Timothy J Heasley (Apolito, Alessandro) |
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ( Show Cause Response due by 7/10/2019.) If a defendant fails to respond to a complaint, the plaintiff may move for a Clerks Entry of Default. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). In this case, although the Defendant has failed to timely respond to the Complaint, Plaintiff has not yet moved for a Clerks Entry of Default. Accordingly it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, on or before July 10, 2019, shall either move for Clerks Entry of Default against Defendant, or show cause why this action should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution; and a failure to comply with this Order may result in immediate dismissal of this action without prejudice. Show Cause Response due by 7/10/2019. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 7/3/2019. (vty)
|
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document National Oak Distributors, Inc.. Answer due 6/28/2019. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Timothy J Heasley. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 6/12/2019. (vty)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by National Oak Distributors, Inc.. (Broeker, Douglas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Douglas Crane Broeker on behalf of National Oak Distributors, Inc.. Attorney Douglas Crane Broeker added to party National Oak Distributors, Inc.(pty:dft). (Broeker, Douglas) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney(s) Timothy J Heasley. The Court reserves the power to withdraw permission for special appearance prior to and during the time of trial. Failure to abide by any Court order or failure to appear at any scheduled matter may result in immediate revocation of counsels pro hac vice status. Local counsel must be ready to adequately represent the party at any time, including conducting the actual trial. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 5/30/2019. (vty)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Vincent N. Miranda. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11682261 by Timothy J Heasley. Responses due by 6/12/2019 (Apolito, Alessandro) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Timothy J Heasley. National Oak Distributors, Inc. served on 5/23/2019, answer due 6/13/2019. (Apolito, Alessandro) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to National Oak Distributors, Inc.. (lbc) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 5/17/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Timothy J Heasley (Apolito, Alessandro) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Oak Distributors, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID 113C-11647477, payment transferred from : 19CV80646, filed by Timothy J Heasley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Apolito, Alessandro) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heasley v. National Oak Distributors, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Oak Distributors, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Crane Broeker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy J Heasley | |
| Represented By: | Alessandro A Apolito |
| Represented By: | Vincent M. Miranda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
