The Independent Order of Foresters v. Gold-Fogel et al
Plaintiff: The Independent Order of Foresters
Defendant: Cathleen Gold-Fogel and David Fogel
Case Number: 9:2019cv80824
Filed: June 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Dave Lee Brannon
Referring Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2019 Filing 7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by The Independent Order of Foresters (Pett, Kristina)
August 5, 2019 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by The Independent Order of Foresters. Cathleen Gold-Fogel waiver sent on 7/3/2019, answer due 9/3/2019. (Pett, Kristina)
August 5, 2019 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Cathleen Gold-Fogel on July 3, 2019 by The Independent Order of Foresters. Waiver of Service due by 8/2/2019. (Pett, Kristina)
July 19, 2019 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by The Independent Order of Foresters. David Fogel waiver sent on 7/5/2019, answer due 9/3/2019. (Pett, Kristina)
July 19, 2019 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to David Fogel on July 5, 2019 by The Independent Order of Foresters. (Pett, Kristina)
June 21, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz)
June 21, 2019 Filing 1 Interpleader Complaint Filing fees $400.00 receipt number 113C-11753412, filed by The Independent Order of Foresters. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate, #2 Exhibit B - Final Judgment Dissolution of Marriage, #3 Exhibit C - Death Certificate, #4 Exhibit D - Composite Exhibit - Correspondence, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pett, Kristina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Independent Order of Foresters v. Gold-Fogel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cathleen Gold-Fogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Fogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Independent Order of Foresters
Represented By: Kristina Beth Pett
Represented By: Riley Francis Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?