Pagan v. Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc.
| Nicholas Pagan |
| Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc. |
| 9:2019cv80842 |
| June 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 7/25/2019. See attached document for full details. (gp)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant, Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc. by Nicholas Pagan (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc.. (Alves, Arthur) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Arthur Edmond Alves, II on behalf of Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc.. Attorney Arthur Edmond Alves, II added to party Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc.(pty:dft). (Alves, Arthur) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Nicholas Pagan. Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc. served on 6/28/2019, answer due 7/19/2019. (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc.. (kpe) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Nicholas Pagan (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. The party(ies) on the summons(es) does not match the initiating documents (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11763503, filed by Nicholas Pagan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Leal, Alberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pagan v. Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Capitol Lighting EH Divisions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Arthur Edmond Alves, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicholas Pagan | |
| Represented By: | Alberto R. Leal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
