M22 Fund, LLC v. Gallon et al
| M22 Fund, LLC |
| Line Martin, Royal Palm Improvement Association and Stuart Bryan Gallon |
| 9:2019cv80876 |
| July 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order of Dismissal and Remand to: 15th Judicial Circuit Court. State Court Case Number: 502019CA000194. (gp) |
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to CLOSE this case in this District. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 7/22/2019. See attached document for full details. (gp)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF REMOVAL re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Line Martin. (pcs) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by M22 Fund, LLC. Attorney Brian Roger Kopelowitz added to party M22 Fund, LLC(pty:pla). Responses due by 7/29/2019 (Kopelowitz, Brian) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #7 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Jurisdictional Memorandum. Defendant shall file an Amended Notice of Removal by no later than July 17, 2019. Failure to file an amended notice of removal that properly alleges a basis for this Court's exercise of jurisdiction by July 17, 2019 will result in a dismissal without prejudice without further notice. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 7/12/2019. (fc)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #3 Memorandum by Line Martin. Responses due by 7/26/2019 (pcs) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL AND STATE COURT RECORDS. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 7/3/2019. See attached document for full details. (fc)
|
| Filing 5 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. State Court Records not included. Filer is instructed to file a NOTICE OF FILING with the State Court Records attached within 24 hours. (jc) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Line Martin. (kpe) |
| Filing 3 Jurisdictional MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), by Stuart Bryan Gallon (an individual), Line Martin. (kpe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT ) Filing fee $400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Stuart Bryan Gallon (an individual), Stuart Bryan Gallon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kpe) Modified on 7/2/2019 (kpe). State Court Records not provided by filers. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
