Pagan v. Calzedonia USA, Inc.
| Nicholas Pagan |
| Calzedonia USA, Inc. |
| 9:2019cv80905 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nicholas Pagan (Leal, Alberto) |
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer/Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall file its response to the Complaint no later than September 13, 2019. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/9/2019. (lbn)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint re #1 Complaint by Calzedonia USA, Inc.. Responses due by 8/23/2019 (Brito, Alejandro) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alejandro Brito on behalf of Calzedonia USA, Inc.. Attorney Alejandro Brito added to party Calzedonia USA, Inc.(pty:dft). (Brito, Alejandro) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Nicholas Pagan. Calzedonia USA, Inc. served on 7/23/2019, answer due 8/13/2019. (Leal, Alberto) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/2/2019) Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/19/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Calzedonia USA, Inc.. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calzedonia USA, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11801796, filed by Nicholas Pagan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Calzedonia USA, Inc.)(Leal, Alberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pagan v. Calzedonia USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Calzedonia USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alejandro Brito |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicholas Pagan | |
| Represented By: | Alberto R. Leal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
