Pagan v. Techstyle Fashion Group
| Nicholas Pagan |
| Techstyle Fashion Group |
| 9:2019cv80907 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodolfo A Ruiz |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. Per ECF No. #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (gp) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant with Prejudice by Nicholas Pagan (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Nicholas Pagan. Techstyle Fashion Group served on 7/17/2019, answer due 8/7/2019. (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 6 First RESPONSE To order requiring certificate of counsel regarding any prior filings made under the ADA by Nicholas Pagan. (Leal, Alberto) |
Filing 5
ORDER Requiring Verified Certificate of Counsel Regarding any Prior Filings Under The Americans with Disabilities Act. Statement of Claim due by 7/25/2019. Signed by Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz on 7/11/2019. See attached document for full details. (gp)
|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (mee) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Techstyle Fashion Group. (mee) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodolfo A Ruiz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Techstyle Fashion Group, d/b/a Just Fab. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11801809, filed by Nicholas Pagan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Techstyle Fashion Group, d/b/a Just Fab)(Leal, Alberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pagan v. Techstyle Fashion Group | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Techstyle Fashion Group | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicholas Pagan | |
| Represented By: | Alberto R. Leal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
