Pagan v. Richemont North America, Inc.
| Nicholas Pagan |
| Richemont North America, Inc. |
| 9:2019cv80908 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Dave Lee Brannon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case, all deadlines and hearings are TERMINATED, and any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/5/2019. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant with Prejudice by Nicholas Pagan (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 6 First RESPONSE To order requiring certificate of counsel regarding any prior filings made under the ADA by Nicholas Pagan. (Leal, Alberto) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING ANY PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, ( Responses due by 8/1/2019) Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 7/18/2019. See attached document for full details. (cqs)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Nicholas Pagan. Richemont North America, Inc. served on 7/18/2019, answer due 8/8/2019. (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Richemont North America, Inc.. (cds) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/11/2019) (cds). |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Richemont North America, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11801828, filed by Nicholas Pagan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Richemont North America, Inc.)(Leal, Alberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pagan v. Richemont North America, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Richemont North America, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nicholas Pagan | |
| Represented By: | Alberto R. Leal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
