Castro v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Jeanette A. Castro |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 9:2019cv80918 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William Matthewman |
| Rodney Smith |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (pcs) |
Filing 6
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS [DE 5] AND ORDER REGARDING SERVICE: granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service Ordered and Summonses NOT provided for USM Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 7/22/2019. See attached document for full details. (kza)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (vmz) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #3 with out prejudice Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 7/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (kza)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeanette A. Castro. (ar2) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith and Magistrate Judge William Matthewman. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pursuant to the Clerks directive of this cause, this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Review of a Social Security Disability against Commissioner of Social Security Administration. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Jeanette A. Castro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summon(s))(ar2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Castro v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeanette A. Castro | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
