Cohan v. Jupiter West Sunoco, LLC
Howard Cohan |
Jupiter West Sunoco, LLC |
9:2019cv80919 |
July 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Roy K Altman |
Dave Lee Brannon |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER re: parties Notice of Pending Settlement [ECF No. 8]. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case for administrative purposes only. All pending deadlines and hearings are TERMINATED, and any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/23/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds) Modified text on 8/23/2019 (mr1). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Howard Cohan (Weiss, Jason) |
Filing 7 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT AND CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES. Joint Scheduling Report due by 8/26/2019 Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel R. Levine on behalf of Jupiter West Sunoco, LLC. Attorney Daniel R. Levine added to party Jupiter West Sunoco, LLC(pty:dft). (Levine, Daniel) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Counsel re #4 Order of Requirements,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, by Jason Stuart Weiss on behalf of Howard Cohan (Weiss, Jason) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING VERIFIED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL REGARDING ANY PRIOR FILINGS UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. ( Responses due by 8/1/2019) Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 7/18/2019. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Jupiter West Sunoco, LLC. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jupiter West Sunoco, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11806069, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Weiss, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cohan v. Jupiter West Sunoco, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan | |
Represented By: | Jason Stuart Weiss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jupiter West Sunoco, LLC | |
Represented By: | Daniel R. Levine |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.