Bryan v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
| Amy R. Bryan |
| Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC |
| 9:2019cv81048 |
| July 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Dave Lee Brannon |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Amy R. Bryan (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Amy R. Bryan (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 9
ORDER re #8 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, (Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/16/2019). Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 9/12/2019. See attached document for full details. (pcs)
|
|
Filing 8
Order Requiring Scheduling Report And Certificates of Interested Parties. Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/9/2019 Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 8/26/2019. See attached document for full details. (vmz)
|
| Filing 7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta) |
| Filing 6 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC. Attorney Sangeeta G. Philip-Spengler added to party Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC(pty:dft). (Philip-Spengler, Sangeeta) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Amy R. Bryan. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC served on 8/5/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC. (vmz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (vmz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11835786, filed by Amy R. Bryan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bryan v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy R. Bryan | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Sangeeta G. Philip-Spengler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
