Song v. Secretary of the Army
Plaintiff: Xiaodan Song
Defendant: Mark T Esper and Secretary of the Army
Case Number: 9:2019cv81068
Filed: July 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Roy K Altman
Referring Judge: Dave Lee Brannon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0791
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by Xiaodan Song. Secretary of the Army served on 8/20/2019, answer due 10/21/2019. (Sconzo, Gregory)
August 1, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Secretary of the Army. (dj)
August 1, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Xiaodan Song re #5 Amended Complaint filed by Xiaodan Song (Attachments: #1 Summon(s)) (Sconzo, Gregory)
July 30, 2019 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Secretary of the Army, filed by Xiaodan Song. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Exhibit 2017 Charge, #3 Exhibit 2018 Charge, #4 Exhibit Letters to EEO)(Sconzo, Gregory)
July 29, 2019 Filing 4 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Party(ies) Improperly Formatted. The Filer failed to enter the party name(s) in accordance with the CM/ECF Format for Adding Parties for Attorneys Guide. The correction was made. It is not necessary to re-file the document. (pcs)
July 29, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Secretary of the Army (pcs)
July 26, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs)
July 26, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mark T Esper. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11850505, filed by Xiaodan Song. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit 2017 Charge, #4 Exhibit 2018 Charge, #5 Exhibit EEO Letters)(Sconzo, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Song v. Secretary of the Army
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xiaodan Song
Represented By: Gregory Steven Sconzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark T Esper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secretary of the Army
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?