Alegria v. United States Postal Service
Susan Alegria |
United States Postal Service |
9:2019cv81237 |
September 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Roy K Altman |
Dave Lee Brannon |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0704 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Susan Alegria. United States Postal Service served on 10/16/2019, answer due 11/6/2019. (Levy, Chad) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to United States Postal Service (cbr) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Susan Alegria re #1 Complaint filed by Susan Alegria (Attachments: #1 Summon(s)) (Cozad, David) |
Filing 6 PAPERLESS ORDER requiring the Plaintiff to file, on or before October 18, 2019, a response to #5 the Defendant's Notice of Insufficient Service of Process. The Plaintiff will be relieved of this requirement if she files a new or amended proof of service by October 18. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 10/6/2019. (jrf) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by United States Postal Service re #4 Summons Returned Executed of Insufficient Service of Process. Attorney Alicia Hayley Welch added to party United States Postal Service (pty:dft). (Welch, Alicia) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Susan Alegria. United States Postal Service served on 9/13/2019, answer due 10/4/2019. (Levy, Chad) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Postal Service. (mee) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (mee) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Postal Service. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-11959446, filed by Susan Alegria. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Cozad, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alegria v. United States Postal Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Susan Alegria | |
Represented By: | David Mitchell Cozad |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Postal Service | |
Represented By: | Alicia Hayley Welch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.