Cohan v. Pramukhji Donut Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan
Defendant: Shreeji Management, Inc., Sahajanand Donut LLC, Ghanshyam Donut, LLC, Pramukhji Donut Corporation, Shreeji Management, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Dunkin Donuts, Ghanshyam Donut, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as Dunkin Donuts, Sahajanand Donut LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as Dunkin Donuts and Pramukhji Donut Corporation a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Dunkin Donuts
Case Number: 9:2019cv81440
Filed: October 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Dave Lee Brannon
Referring Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER CLOSING CASE Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 11/19/2019. See attached document for full details. (ail)
November 18, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Howard Cohan (Sconzo, Gregory)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER. On November 11, 2019, the Parties notified the Court that they have settled this matter. (DE #13 ). I congratulate the Parties on reaching an amicable resolution of this case. Although the Parties ask for thirty (30) days to prepare the appropriate closing documents, no cause for such a delay is apparent from the Parties' Notice of Settlement, and therefore that request is denied. Consistent with the instructions set forth in the ADA Title III Scheduling Order (DE #4 ), the Parties must file closing documents within ten (10) days, or by November 21, 2019. The court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement if requested to do so before closing the case. The Parties are advised that the Notice of Settlement does not stay this litigation, and therefore until a joint stipulation of dismissal is filed, the court will expect compliance with all pretrial deadlines. However, I will extend Plaintiff's deadline to file the verified statement responding to the Court's interrogatories to November 21, 2019. By November 21, 2019, therefore, the Parties must file the appropriate closing documents or Plaintiff must file the verified statement responding to the Court's interrogatories. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 11/12/2019. (kal)
November 11, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Howard Cohan (Sconzo, Gregory)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #11 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's deadline to file the verified statement responding to the court's interrogatories was November 6, 2019. On that deadline, Plaintiff filed the present Motion requesting a five-day extension because it has been unable to get the statement verified by the current deadline. Plaintiff further represents that he anticipates getting the verification by November 8, 2019. I will grant Plaintiffs request and require him to file the verified statement by November 12, 2019. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 11/7/2019. (kal)
November 6, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #4 Scheduling Order by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sconzo, Gregory)
November 4, 2019 Filing 10 Clerks Notice to Filer re #5 Summons Returned Executed. Incorrect Service Date Entered; ERROR - The incorrect service date was entered. The correction was made by the Clerk and filing was re-docketed, see DE# 9 Summons Returned Executed. It is not necessary to refile this document. (mc)
November 1, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Ghanshyam Donut, LLC served on 10/28/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. (See DE #5 for image). (mc)
November 1, 2019 Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Pramukhji Donut Corporation served on 10/28/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. (Sconzo, Gregory)
November 1, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Sahajanand Donut LLC served on 10/28/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. (Sconzo, Gregory)
November 1, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Shreeji Management, Inc. served on 10/28/2019, answer due 11/18/2019. (Sconzo, Gregory)
November 1, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Howard Cohan. Ghanshyam Donut, LLC served on 10/29/2019, answer due 11/19/2019. (Sconzo, Gregory)
October 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ADA TITLE III SCHEDULING ORDER: Mediation Deadline 1/15/2020. Status Report due by 1/22/2020. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 10/24/2019. See attached document for full details. (jas)
October 23, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ghanshyam Donut, LLC, Pramukhji Donut Corporation, Sahajanand Donut LLC, Shreeji Management, Inc. (ar2)
October 23, 2019 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ar2)
October 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ghanshyam Donut, LLC, Pramukhji Donut Corporation, Sahajanand Donut LLC, Shreeji Management, INC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12087369, filed by Howard Cohan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s))(Sconzo, Gregory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cohan v. Pramukhji Donut Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Cohan
Represented By: Gregory Steven Sconzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shreeji Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sahajanand Donut LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ghanshyam Donut, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pramukhji Donut Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shreeji Management, Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Dunkin Donuts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ghanshyam Donut, LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as Dunkin Donuts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sahajanand Donut LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as Dunkin Donuts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pramukhji Donut Corporation a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Dunkin Donuts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?