Mapp-Leslie v. Amtrak Trains
| Chantel Mapp-Leslie |
| Amtrak Trains and Amtrak Trains doing business as National Railroad Passenger Corporation |
| 9:2019cv81465 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| Dave Lee Brannon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Compliance re #14 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, copy of summons and complaint were placed in the USM interoffice mailbox for service of process (jao) |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued as to Amtrak Trains. (jao). |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Granting to the extent that the plaintiff need not prepay even a partial filing fee in this case, or to prepay costs such as for service of process. USM Service ordered . Summonses provided for issuance by Clerk for USM Service. Re: #11 Notice of Filing Proposed Summons(es) filed by Chantel Mapp-Leslie. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon on 12/19/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
| Filing 13 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Amtrak Trains. Responses due by 12/30/2019 (Si-Ping Chu, Stella) |
| Filing 12 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons cannot be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. (pes) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Chantel Mapp-Leslie (Waugh, Christian) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stella Si-Ping Chu on behalf of Amtrak Trains. Attorney Stella Si-Ping Chu added to party Amtrak Trains(pty:dft). (Si-Ping Chu, Stella) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christian W Waugh on behalf of Chantel Mapp-Leslie. Attorney Christian W Waugh added to party Chantel Mapp-Leslie(pty:pla). (Waugh, Christian) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 11/1/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao)
|
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #4 Motion for Email Communication; denying #5 Motion for Telephonic Appearance. Signed by Judge Roy K. Altman on 11/1/2019. (vve)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Chantel Mapp-Leslie. (jao) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Telephonic Appearance by Chantel Mapp-Leslie. (jao) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Email Communication by Chantel Mapp-Leslie. (jao) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chantel Mapp-Leslie. (jao) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Roy K. Altman and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amtrak Trains. Filing fees $ 400.00. IFP Filed, filed by Chantel Mapp-Leslie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
