Lopez v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc.
Marangely Lopez |
G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc. |
9:2019cv81585 |
November 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Bruce E Reinhart |
Robin L Rosenberg |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Marangely Lopez (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Rosenberg, R) |
Filing 6 STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE BRUCE REINHART. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart on 12/30/2019. See attached document for full details. (jao) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER: ( Trial set for 11/9/2020 at 9:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg., Calendar Call set for 11/4/2020 at 9:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg., Status Conference set for 10/7/2020 at 9:30 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart for discovery matters.. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 12/23/2019. See attached document for full details. (pes) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 4 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Marangely Lopez. Attorney Kelly Elisabeth Eisenlohr-Moul added to party Marangely Lopez(pty:pla). (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc.. (pcs) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (pcs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12173407, filed by Marangely Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Rosenberg, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lopez v. G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marangely Lopez | |
Represented By: | R Edward Rosenberg |
Represented By: | Kelly Elisabeth Eisenlohr-Moul |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.