Capitol Records, LLC et al v. Redigi Inc. et al
| Capitol Christian Music Group, Inc., Virgin Records IR Holdings, Inc. and Capitol Records, LLC |
| Larry Rudolph a/k/a Lawrence S. Rogel, John Ossenmacher, Redigi Inc., Larry Rudolph and S. Rogel |
| 9:2019mc80208 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kristen Lake Cardoso on behalf of Martin V. Katz. Attorney Kristen Lake Cardoso added to party Martin V. Katz(pty:res). (Cardoso, Kristen) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Scott Jason Weiselberg on behalf of Martin V. Katz. Attorney Scott Jason Weiselberg added to party Martin V. Katz(pty:res). (Weiselberg, Scott) |
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, ECF No. #10 . Gary Steven Betensky and Nadine D. Singh withdrawn as counsel for Non-Party Martin V. Katz. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to remove Attorneys Betensky and Singh as counsel of record. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (laa)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for Non-Party Martin V. Katz, Esquire by Gary S. Betensky, Nadine D. Singh and Day Pitney LLP for / by Martin V. Katz. Responses due by 11/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Betensky, Gary) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Privilege Log, to the extent that the parties are in agreement with respect to the proposed extension. The Court notes that the 7.1(a)(3) conferral fails to indicate whether the request is opposed. In addition, pursuant to Local Rule 26.1(a), if the parties agree to an extension, no Court order is required, as there is no scheduling order in this case. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (ak03)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Privilege Log by Martin V. Katz. Responses due by 11/20/2019 (Betensky, Gary) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Plaintiffs' Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action by Martin V. Katz. (Betensky, Gary) |
| Filing 6 Objection to subpoena to #5 Notice (Other) by 17 Golfview Road LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Ord, George) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Capitol Christian Music Group, Inc., Capitol Records, LLC, Virgin Records IR Holdings, Inc. of Issuance of Third-Party Subpoenas (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Ries, Heather) |
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Terence G. Banich. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Terence G. Banich. Filing Fee $ 75.00 Receipt # 113C-11412067 by Capitol Christian Music Group, Inc., Capitol Records, LLC, Virgin Records IR Holdings, Inc.. Responses due by 3/7/2019 (Ries, Heather) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. (vmz) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. (vmz) |
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION of Foreign Judgment . Filing fee $47.00 receipt number 113C-11389783, filed by Capitol Records, LLC, Virgin Records IR Holdings, Inc., Capitol Christian Music Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Judgment)(Ries, Heather) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
