Vera v. MDVIP, LLC
| Shawn Vera |
| MDVIP, LLC |
| 9:2020cv80014 |
| January 7, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Kenneth A Marra |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Clerks Non-Entry of Default as to Shawn Vera - Motions Terminated: #6 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default. Reason: Responsive pleading (i.e. Motion for Extention of Time to File Answer to Complaint, Motion to Dismiss Complaint, etc) has been filed Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 2/3/2020. (dj) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by MDVIP, LLC. (McManus, John) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by MDVIP, LLC (McManus, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul Bernard Ranis on behalf of MDVIP, LLC. Attorney Paul Bernard Ranis added to party MDVIP, LLC(pty:dft). (Ranis, Paul) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Luger McManus on behalf of MDVIP, LLC. Attorney John Luger McManus added to party MDVIP, LLC(pty:dft). (McManus, John) |
| Filing 6 Plaintiff's MOTION for Clerks Entry of Default against Defendant as to MDVIP, LLC by Shawn Vera. (Harne, Alexander) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alexander Thomas Harne on behalf of Shawn Vera. Attorney Alexander Thomas Harne added to party Shawn Vera(pty:pla). (Harne, Alexander) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Shawn Vera. MDVIP, LLC served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020. (Storch, Noah) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MDVIP, LLC. (drz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Kenneth A. Marra and Magistrate Judge William Matthewman. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (drz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against MDVIP, LLC. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C-12281881, filed by Shawn Vera. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Storch, Noah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vera v. MDVIP, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shawn Vera | |
| Represented By: | Noah E Storch |
| Represented By: | Alexander Thomas Harne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MDVIP, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Paul Bernard Ranis |
| Represented By: | John Luger McManus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
