Team Services Incorporated v. Securitas Electronic Security, INC et al
| Team Services Incorporated and TSI |
| Securitas Electronic Security, INC and The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. |
| 9:2020cv80039 |
| January 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Dave Lee Brannon |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 1/13/2020 in the amount of $ 400.00, receipt number FLS900006724 (cds) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (cds) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRANCT against Securitas Electronic Security, INC, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. Filing fees $ 400.00 (Not Paid/No IFP FIled), filed by Team Services Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cds) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/13/2020) (cds). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
