Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company v. Jaeder et al
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company |
Ann Jaeder and Robert Jaeder |
9:2020cv80164 |
February 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Raag Singhal |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER of DISMISSAL re #9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; Cause Shall Stand Dismissed without prejudice; Closing Case. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/19/2020. See attached document for full details. (ls) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company (Whittle, Shirley) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company re #5 Summons Issued (Whittle, Shirley) |
Filing 7 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report and Certificates of Interested Parties Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/14/2020. See attached document for full details. (cbr) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE.Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/13/2020. (eca) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ann Jaeder, Robert Jaeder. (dj) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company re #1 Complaint, filed by Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company, 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case, Summons(es) (Whittle, Shirley) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) cannot be issued. Summons NOT issued for the following reason - A Summons needs to be issued as to each individual party. One summons can not be issued as to both parties.. (drz) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition For Declaratory Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Petition to Appoint Competent and Impartial Appraiser against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID AFLSDC-12398829, payment transferred from : 9:20-cv-80164-XXXX Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company v. Jaeder et al, filed by Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Whittle, Shirley) Modified text on 2/6/2020 (jc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.