Rok Consulting, Inc. v. Transcanna Holdings, Inc.
Rok Consulting, Inc. |
Transcanna Holdings, Inc. |
9:2020cv80169 |
February 5, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Dave Lee Brannon |
Donald M Middlebrooks |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #13 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant requests a 30-day extension of the deadline to respond to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production, as well as the deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (DE #5 ). Defendant states in support that its progress in this matter has been stalled due to COVID-19, which has caused its counsel to work from home while caring for children that are out of school. I find good cause to grant the requested relief. Accordingly, Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and First Request for Production on or before April 22, 2020, and shall file its response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss on or before May 1, 2020. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 3/27/2020. (gts) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time Extend Deadlines Related to Jurisdictional Discovery and Related Deadlines by Transcanna Holdings, Inc.. Responses due by 4/6/2020 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tache, Walter) |
Filing 12 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Rok Consulting, Inc. (DeSouza, Daniel) |
Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #8 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and Leave to Conduct Limited Jurisdictional Discovery. Plaintiff states that as Defendant seeks to dismiss this case based on a lack of personal jurisdiction (DE #5 ), 45 days of limited jurisdictional discovery are necessary. Defendant does not oppose the grant of jurisdictional discovery, but expresses no opinion as to the appropriate length of that discovery. I find good cause to allow 21 days of jurisdictional discovery until March 25, 2020. Discovery during this period should only be related to jurisdictional issues. As requested, Plaintiff's response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (DE #5 ) will be due 7 days later, on April 1, 2020. If, despite an exercise of diligence, Plaintiff is unable to complete the necessary discovery in that period, Plaintiff may move for an extension of the jurisdictional discovery period. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 3/4/2020. (gts) |
Filing 10 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION: ( Amended Pleadings due by 3/16/2020., Discovery due by 6/29/2020., Joinder of Parties due by 3/16/2020., In Limine Motions due by 7/13/2020., Dispositive Motions due by 7/13/2020., Motions due by 7/13/2020., Pretrial Stipulation due by 8/17/2020.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon on 3/3/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds) |
Filing 9 PAPERLESS MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 3/3/2020. Attorney Appearances: Daniel DeSouza for Plaintiff | Walter J. Tache for Defendant. Pretrial and scheduling matters discussed. Scheduling Order to follow. (DAR/Time in Court: 15:02:44/19 mins.)jb02) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), Amended Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Alternative Motion to Dismiss Based on Forum Non-Conveniens by Rok Consulting, Inc.. (DeSouza, Daniel) |
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Telephone Conference set for March 3, 2020 at 3:00 P.M. in West Palm Beach Division before U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. At that time, the parties shall call (888) 808-6929 and enter access code 2036573. Any motions to modify the existing trial date should be filed prior to the telephonic scheduling conference. Because of the expedited nature of the conference, the parties are relieved of Local Rule 16.1(b)s conference report requirement. The parties must be prepared at their assigned time but may have to wait 10-20 minutes before their conference begins, as the Court sets multiple cases per 30-minute time slot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon on 2/27/2020. (spe) |
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRIGN CASE AND SETTING TRIAL DATE: ( Jury Trial set for 9/14/2020 09:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks., Calendar Call set for 9/9/2020 01:15 PM before Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dave L. Brannon for Scheduling Conference. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 2/26/2020. See attached document for full details. (cds) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), Amended Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Alternative Motion to Dismiss Based on Forum Non-Conveniens by Transcanna Holdings, Inc.. Responses due by 3/4/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhbit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Tache, Walter) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Transcanna Holdings, Inc. Civil Cover Sheet (Tache, Walter) |
Filing 3 Clerks Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (cds) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks and Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cds) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Rok Consulting Inc v. Transcanna Holdings Inc) Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number AFLSDC-12405545, filed by Transcanna Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Composite Exhibit A)(Tache, Walter) Text Modified on 2/5/2020 (cds). No Answer Filed/Motion to Dismiss Filed (Exh.# 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rok Consulting, Inc. v. Transcanna Holdings, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rok Consulting, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Daniel DeSouza |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Transcanna Holdings, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Walter J. Tache |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.