Lane v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Acting Commissioner Michael Lane |
| Inc Pfizer, Chattem Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pfizer, Inc. |
| 9:2020cv80474 |
| March 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSE-OUT. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 3/27/2020. See attached document for full details. (mc)
|
| Filing 18 Summons Reissued as to Pfizer, Inc. (mc) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) Pfizer, Inc. by Michael Lane (Scott, Carmen) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE by Michael Lane of Withdrawal of Counsel Vincent Greene (Scott, Carmen) |
| Filing 15 Summons Reissued as to Pfizer, Inc. (mc) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) Pfizer Inc. by Michael Lane (Scott, Carmen) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Carmen Sessions Scott on behalf of Michael Lane. Attorney Carmen Sessions Scott added to party Michael Lane(pty:pla). (Scott, Carmen) |
| Filing 12 MDL Transfer In Case Receipt from District of Rhode Island. Case Number 1:20-cv-00099 with documents 1-9. Assigned FLSD Case Number 9:20-cv-80474-RLR on 3/23/2020. Re: FLSD MDL Case Number 9:20-md-02924-RLR. (mc) |
| Filing 11 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. (mc) |
| Filing 10 Case transferred in from Rhode Island; Case Number 1:20-cv-00099. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. .(mc). |
| Filing 9 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-6): Transferring this matter to the Southern District of Florida for assignment to the Honorable Robin L. Rosenberg for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings in MDL No. 2924. So Ordered by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel on 3/20/2020. (Jackson, Ryan) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Lane. Sanofi US Services Inc. served on 3/4/2020, answer due 3/25/2020. (Greene, Vincent) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Lane. Pfizer, Inc. served on 3/10/2020, answer due 3/31/2020. (Greene, Vincent) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Lane. Chattem. Inc. served on 3/4/2020, answer due 3/25/2020. (Greene, Vincent) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Lane. GlaxoSmithkline, LLC. served on 3/10/2020, answer due 3/31/2020. (Greene, Vincent) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Lane. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. served on 3/10/2020, answer due 3/31/2020. (Greene, Vincent) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Chattem. Inc., GlaxoSmithkline, LLC., Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENING NOTICE ISSUED (Simoncelli, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT ( filing fee paid $ 400.00, receipt number 0103-1479625 ), filed by Michael Lane. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Greene, Vincent) |
| Case assigned to District Judge William E. Smith and Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond. (Simoncelli, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
